ive been a fan of Michael since i heard bad when i was 2. Ive been watching a lot of programmes on him recently and read a lot in the papers.
Im 99% sure hes innocent. I agree with cookie, the adult magazines sound normal to me. I read quite a bit on what Mike was meant to have done but i cant really post it here coz its sick. But the first time that lad met Micheal he supposidly showed him porn, and later did those things to him. This all sounds stupid to me, if a man, no matter who he is, sexually assults u, u dont go back to his house again. Surely thats commen sence, but those children allegidly went back to his house.
i think Micheal is a very nieve man but hes no paedophile. I really hope he isnt found guilty, if he is i dont think i will ever fully believe it.